Facebook Twitter Gplus YouTube RSS
magnify
formats

Support Anti-Fluoride Initiatives in 2013!

Support FFK in 2013!

Positive things are happening in Kansas for 2013 – including new initiatives in cities such as Salina, our capitol city of Topeka, more correspondence to our organization and a number of new candidates running for positions in local government. Time is short to promote favorable candidates in upcoming elections – such as for the Wichita City Council, this year. And ballot initiatives (offensives) can be costly to organize – a process that must be ongoing in order to approach the goal of a fluoride free Kansas.

For fluoride chemical suppliers, the disposal of these toxins into our community water supplies is a profitable business in comparison to the cost of hazardous waste disposal by other means. For the fluoridationists in the medical and dental community, it’s kicking the can for decades to guard against their loss of credibility. The substance primarily used in newer systems is hydrofluosilicic acid and most frequently for older systems – sodium fluoride. The environment and our own kidneys become their toxic waste filters. Kansans pay a high price both in taxation and in the long-term health consequences of this long outdated and dangerous practice.

Fluoridation continues in over 60 Kansas cities and rural water districts, many of which have been consuming fluoridated water for decades. Imagine the potential savings to these communities every year, both to their health and our environment.

The City of Wichita dodged a proverbial bullet on November 6th – or shall we say ‘drop’? After six months worth of hard work and sacrifice by those that recognized fluoridation as a matter of human rights, Wichita declared a resounding no and today remains fluoride-free. Wichita won its freedom from fluoride once again, but the unhealthy practice of fluoridation continues in a great number of Kansas towns that need help to start the process and stand with them, as needed. This is where we come in.

Fluoride Free Kansas, groups and candidates that oppose water fluoridation need your help to provide not only basic life-support, but to increase our outreach to other communities. Also to fund new legal actions, launch electronic/physical petition drives and ballot initiatives to compel leaders throughout the state with the help of our talented associates. Publications must be produced and continually distributed throughout the state as well, in order to raise further awareness of this very important issue.

Whether just on the basis of their own research or simply their respect for personal liberty (your right to choose) – candidates for public office that would respect your right to choose (especially on the city and county level), need the support of Joe Public in order to take these leadership positions.

Fluoridation won’t always be in the forefront of any one candidate’s mind without the persistent nudge from independent activists – so FFK has identified local candidates, campaigns, related causes and projects that we feel should be supported by our organization. FFK and its partner entity, People Like You will help promote candidates favorable to our cause throughout 2013 but we need your generous support to do so. If every Kansan in opposition to fluoride chipped-in a dollar, entities like the Kansas Health Foundation and local medical/dental coalitions could then pick on someone ‘their own size’.

Dental Professionals Profit from Fluorosis Treatment

Immediate Funding Goals:

Times are tight, but we aim to make the most effective use of every contribution! Chip-in’s as large as $200 or $100 can go far, but $50 or even as little as $5 adds up to effective drops in a proverbial bucket. Your generous support in the coming months will be essential!

Can we count on you?

Donate #2

With your help, the fight against fluoridation in Kansas will continue.

 

Fluoride Free Kansas Domain Logo
Support the Fluoride Opposition

 

Droplet  #1

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
Comments Off  comments 
formats

Wichita: Remove Vice-Mayor Janet Miller

Travis Crank
Fluoride Free Kansas
February 24th, 2013

Remove Vice-Mayor Janet Miller

Wichita’s Vice-Mayor Janet Miller has made her position on the issue of water fluoridation crystal clear, as well as her contempt for public-opinion on numerous issues. She’s advocated for the forced-medication of Kansas’ largest city and would do so again.

FFK urges citizens of Wichita to vote for an alternate District 6 candidate in the Wichita City Council election on February 26th. Donate to promote this post on the social networks and to conduct automated voice calls against her. Time is short!

Know where to vote? → Click here to find your polling place.


October 27th, 2012

“Only one council member, Janet Miller, argued to adopt the [fluoride] ordinance outright. But she eventually made the motion and joined the unanimous vote to put it to a vote.”

Bob Weeks, Voice for Liberty in Wichita


September 7th, 2012

“According to Vice Mayor Janet Miller, Wichita needs to ‘join the 21st century.’ But even if the City Council did vote to immediately climb on board the ‘F’ Train, ironically, they would have found themselves still out of step with the times – more and more cities have abandoned or are fighting to end this out-dated mode of ‘health care’.”

Dr. Stephen C. L’Hommedieu, Advanced Alternatives for Health


August 24th, 2012

“Is ‘Community Water Fluoridation’ like iodized salt? According to Wichita City Council Member and Vice Mayor Janet Miller, we didn’t vote on whether to put iodine in table salt, so Wichitans don’t need to vote on whether to add fluoride to drinking water. There’s a distinguishing factor, however, that somehow Miller didn’t realize: Consumption of iodized salt is a voluntary act. Not so with fluoridated water.”

Bob Weeks, Voice for Liberty in Wichita


August 21st, 2012

If you do the math and its not going to pass, it doesn’t make sense beating your head against a wall,” said Wichita Council member Janet Miller. “So you go ahead with the next best thing.”

Anne Meyer, KWCH 12 Eyewitness News


August 21st, 2012

“Vice-mayor Janet Miller and council member Pete Meitzner wanted to take action to add fluoride, but Miller admitted there wasn’t enough support on the council, so she moved to put the issue on the November ballot.”

George Lawson, KFDI Radio


August 21st, 2012

“Council member Janet Miller argued that fluoridation has been proven safe and effective in preventing tooth decay and that the city should skip the vote and, ‘Join the 21st Century’.”

Dion Lefler, Wichita Eagle


August 20th, 2012

“Public water fluoridation is absolutely a no brainer.”

Parrish Alleman, KAKE News


August 18th, 2012

“Only one council member on Friday – Janet Miller – said outright that she would support an ordinance to fluoridate Wichita’s water.”

Annie Calovich, Wichita Eagle


August 3rd, 2012

“Earlier this summer Eyewitness News asked council members about their stance on adding fluoride to the water. At the time, Mayor Carl Brewer, Lavonta Williams, and Pete Meitzner said they were undecided. James Clendenin, Jeff Longwell, and Michael O’Donnell said they were leaning against it. And Janet Miller said she fully supports the idea.”

Susan Gager, KWCH 12 Eyewitness News


July 23rd, 2012

“Vice Mayor Janet Miller is the most vocal fluoride supporter on the nine-member city council.”

Jim McLean & Phil Cauthon, KHI News Service


July 15th, 2012

“One council member, Vice Mayor Janet Miller, supports fluoridation and is ready to discuss it from the council bench. ‘It’s one of the top 10 public health achievements of the 20th century, and Wichita is one of the remaining few large cities in the country that has not fluoridated its water supply,’ she said. ‘We have a very high rate of dental decay, and there’s definitely a relationship.‘”

Bill Wilson, Wichita Eagle


June 27th, 2012

“The city council would eventually have to decide if fluoride is right for Wichita.  It’s one of a few large cities in the country without it. ‘I think it’s time for us to have the discussion again,’ says council member Janet Miller.”

Michael Schwanke, KWCH 12 Eyewitness News


Election for Three Wichita Council Districts

Support Anti-Fluoride Initiatives in 2013!

 

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
formats

Fluoride-Free Flyers and Logos

David Michael, BSc, MSc, PEng
Fluoride Free Advocates
February 24th, 2013

Fluoride-Free Flyers and Logos

Here are the Fluoride-Free flyers and logos. These are open-source and public domain now. You can send the PDF out directly via e-mail attachment.

Click here for the flyer PDF. These print 3 per page. They print well in black and white or color. Distribute as many as you want. Those receiving these can print more from the link on the flyer.

Click on these links for the Get the F Out logo.

All images can be re-sized for bumper stickers, small stickers and buttons, signs, banners, billboards.

If you have comments or would like to tell me how you are using these materials, please e-mail me at augie@livingfood.us.

Have F-un,

David Michael, BSc, MSc, PEng
State-Licensed Chemical/Environmental Engineer

P.S. If you want it in Spanish, French or the Australian version let me know. If you want a modifiable version for PhotoDraw or equivalent for a $10 gift you can contact me.

Fluoride Poisoning

Support Anti-Fluoride Initiatives in 2013!

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
formats

KRA to Topeka: Protect Legislators’ IQ’s


Huffington Post
February 15th, 2013

Topeka Capitol Building

Topeka Urged To Remove Fluoride From Drinking Water To Protect Legislators’ IQ’s

A Republican group in Kansas wants Topeka city officials to remove fluoride from the city’s drinking water in order to preserve the intelligence of legislators in the state’s capital.

Citing concerns about the chemical’s impact on IQ, the Kansas Republican Assembly, a conservative group that has campaigned against fluoridation, is sending a letter to Topeka’s top leaders urging that the city’s fluoride pipe be shut off during the annual legislative session. A draft of the letter and the minutes of the group’s January meeting where the proposal was made surfaced on the KRA’s website in recent days.

The minutes read:

After hearing the fluoride update, Brian Coss made a motion for the KRA Secretary to write a tactful letter to each Topeka City Council member, Topeka’s City Manager, and Topeka Mayor Bill Bunten, asking that the fluoride valve be turned off during the legislative session to protect our legislators from potential loss of I.Q. and other negative side effects of fluoride while in Topeka. In addition to our legislators and the many others who go to Topeka during the session, Topeka residents would also benefit from the move, and the city could save a lot of money. Eric Henderson seconded the motion, and after some discussion, the 33 members present approved the motion unanimously.

Mark Gietzen, the president of the KRA, told The Huffington Post that a study from the Harvard University School of Public Health released last year confirmed the group’s fears about the impacts of fluoride. The Harvard study said that children exposed to fluoride had lower IQ’s than those not exposed to it. The report was based on studies conducted on children in China.

They are finding that it’s doing damage to children’s brains and lowering IQ,” Gietzen told HuffPost. “It is probably having the same effects on adults.”

Critics of the Harvard report at the time pointed to other studies that show fluoride has no long-term impact on children’s intelligence.

Still, the KRA has made fluoridation a key issue. Last year, the group was active in a successful campaign to defeat a referendum in Wichita to add fluoride to the city’s drinking water. The group has drafted a resolution for state legislators to call on local governments in the state to remove fluoride from the water supply.

Editor’s Note: The KRA only chose to embrace the issue of water fluoridation in October of 2012, after a long and arduous challenge to the Kansas Health Foundation and Wichitans for Healthy Teeth coalition by Fluoride Free Kansas and Pure Water for Wichita that began in May of 2012. A separate group entitled Wichitans Opposed to Fluoridation formed from members of Fluoride Free Kansas.

The KRA suddenly chosen the matter of fluoridation as its primary talking point approximately one month prior to the General Election, and after completely discounting its importance, as the anti-fluoride campaign in Wichita had been underway for nearly 5 months prior to Mr. Gietzen’s involvement.

With exception to the controversy sparked to remove a county fluoride information sheet, Mark Gietzen of the Kansas Republican Assembly had arguably played a relatively small role in the victory against fluoridation in Wichita with its late-entry into the controversy. State and local leaders have not historically taken the KRA and its leadership as serious as its grandstanding and the KRA naively fails to recognize most attention given to it by local media as ridicule to discredit them; due to Mr. Gietzen’s historically bizarre comments and behavior in public forums.

Fluoride is often added to drinking water to help fight tooth decay. Gietzen told HuffPost that while fluoride has benefits for teeth, those should be obtained through the use of the ingredient in toothpaste, not through drinking water. He pointed to toothpaste packages that warn consumers not to swallow the product. In addition to the chemical’s alleged affects on IQ, Gietzen said he and his colleagues count brittle bones and prostate issues among their health concerns about fluoridation.

Lowering IQ is a terrible thing to do to a population,” Gietzen said. “I can’t believe I am alone in it being an urgent thing to take care of.”

He is currently working with officials in Lawrence and Salina in an effort to remove fluoride from the drinking water in those cities.

Topeka Councilman Chad Manspeaker told HuffPost that he has not yet received a letter from the KRA regarding fluoride and its alleged impact on legislators. He did say that he questions the group’s decision to use scientific research in its current proposal, considering issues previously advocated by the KRA were not based in science.

Manspeaker, a leader in Kansas’s liberal Democratic wing, does not believe legislators should be concerned about the effects of fluoride in Topeka’s drinking water, nor is he concerned about the impact of the chemical on intelligence. But he suggested, jokingly, that the conservative KRA may disagree.

They would likely point to me as a argument for why the water is bad,” Manspeaker said, “but I’ve been drinking it my whole life and I’m fine.”

Contact author John Celock

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
Comments Off  comments