Facebook Twitter Gplus YouTube RSS
magnify
Home Articles Fluoridation Issue Bubbling in Des Moines
formats

Fluoridation Issue Bubbling in Des Moines

News Wire
Associated Press
November 27th, 2013

Fluoridation Issue Bubbling in Des Moines


The issue of water fluoridation has bubbled up in Des Moines, more than 50 years after the practice began.

Although fluoridation is common throughout the country as a way to reduce tooth decay and has been the practice in Des Moines since 1959, some people strongly oppose the practice.

Because the use of fluoride remains controversial, the utility sought public comments beginning in October and continuing through Saturday. Water works Chief Executive Officer Bill Stowe told The Des Moines Register that sentiment is running 3-1 against adding fluoride to water, with some people passionately stating their opinions.

You sometimes see opposition to rate increases, but you don’t get this kind of heat and fire,” Stowe said. “It’s an issue that some people feel very passionately about.”

The Des Moines City Council required the water works to fluoridate the water in 1959 after the American Dental Association and health agencies recommended the practice. The amount of fluoride added to Des Moines’ water was reduced slightly in 2010.

Dentists and some health experts contend fluoridation dramatically reduces tooth decay. Opponents argue fluoridation has harmful consequences and amounts to forced medication of people.

The issue has been raised elsewhere in Iowa. In April the Hampton City Council decided to continue adding fluoride to city water. The mayor had raised objections to fluoridation, saying that adding such medicine infringed on the rights of residents.

Many of the comments submitted to the water works were similar to Brandon Brown’s suggestion, which stated, “Get it out of our water!! So many people are against this. There is a lot of evidence that it’s bad for us.”

However, public health agencies state that fluoridation is safe and has been part of remarkable improvements in dental care. They note that in the early 1960s, about 20 percent of people in their mid-50s had lost all their teeth. That figure is now less than 10 percent.

Tooth loss is no longer considered inevitable, and increasingly adults in the United States are retaining most of their teeth for a lifetime,” according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The water works staff has recommended retaining fluoridation until a majority of scientific opinion opposes the practice.


Fluoridation Debate in Des Moines

Should Fluoride be Added to Des Moines Area Water?


 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
2 Comments  comments 
  • patrick gragg

    JA, I was wondering if you ever got my response to your question about my origins.
    patrickvernongragg@gmail.com and I am following your comments,(lol,,I am your only follower!)
    because I couldn’t find it after I posted it

  • jagragg

    Okay,
    short of killing them lying bastards, how do we effectively fight and
    PROVE the fact that they ARE “lying” and ARE “committing fraud” in order
    to poison the water supplies of communities? I mean COME ON, by
    “definition” that is called a “terrorist act!” Why are they not being
    ARRESTED!?!?! Can we PUBLICLY call them “LYING FRAUDS!” and challenge
    them to a civil court action on the FACTS??

    I think that FORCING legal actions in their courts, MAKE them actually look at the Scientific FACTS, let them read for themselves the “battle” between the EPA “administration” and its own employee unions on this very matter and LET A JURY of citizens do their “DUTY.” TAKE IT OUT OF THE HANDS of any “politician” or lying “bureaucrat” from Washington, D.C. that has his own “agenda” and is AFRAID to debate the “professionals in the field” of CURRENT research.

© Fluoride Free Kansas Association